🌱 AI Environmental Impact Dashboard

Visualise the CO₂ emissions, water consumption, energy usage, cost, and local AI savings of your AI interactions. Powered by the AI Impact Plugin.
Methodology: energy from Luccioni et al. (2023); water from Li et al. (2023); carbon from US EPA eGRID 2022; local AI savings from Saad-Falcon et al. (2025).

Live

📂 Load Your Usage Data

When running via Docker Compose, data loads automatically from the live database.
To load data manually, export from Open WebUI by asking the AI: "export my AI impact data as JSON",
then upload the resulting data.json file below — or load the demo data to explore.

 
ℹ️ You are viewing demo data. To see your real usage, export data from Open WebUI and upload it above.
Total Queries
AI requests
Total Tokens
input + output
Energy Used
mWh
CO₂ Emitted
mg CO₂
Water Used
mL
Est. Cost
USD
Local AI Savings
vs. cloud equivalent

Daily CO₂ Emissions

Daily Water Usage

CO₂ by Model

Cost by Model

Per-Model Breakdown

Model Queries Tokens Energy CO₂ Water Cost

Recent Queries

Time (UTC) Model Tokens CO₂ Water Cost
Scientific References
[1] Luccioni, A.S., Viguier, S. & Ligozat, A-L. (2023). Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment? arXiv:2311.16863 / DOI:10.1145/3627673.3679071.
[2] Li, P., Yang, J., Islam, M.A. & Ren, S. (2023). Making AI Less "Thirsty": Uncovering and Addressing the Secret Water Footprint of AI Models. arXiv:2304.03271.
[3] US EPA. (2022). eGRID 2022 — Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database. epa.gov/egrid.
[4] Saad-Falcon, J., Narayan, A. et al. (2025). Intelligence per Watt: Measuring Intelligence Efficiency of Local AI. arXiv:2511.07885. Local LMs (≤20B params) answer 88.7% of real-world queries at frontier accuracy; IPW improved 5.3× (2023–2025).